管理培训搜索
18318889481 13681114876

法律
| Are Directorship Agreements Arbitrable in China?当前您所在的位置:首页 > 法律 > 转创法信事务所 > 国际贸易与海事海商

avatar

If a company appoints its director and enters into an agreement with the director with respect to such appointment and his/her rights and duties thereunder, can disputes arising from such agreement be subject to arbitration in accordance with the arbitration clause?

The Answer is NO. In accordance with a final judgment rendered by the Beijing Second Intermediate People’s Court inTang v. Beijing XX Decoration Technology Company (2019), the agreement, at least the part of which in relation to the organizational structure and internal governance matters, may not be arbitrable.

I. The Case

On 11 Sept. 2019, the Beijing Second Intermediate People’s Court found in its second-instance judgment of Tang v. Beijing XX Decoration Technology Company (“the Company”) that “appointing directors and determining directors’ remunerations are internal organizational acts of the company”. (See [2019] Jing 02 Min Zhong No. 10222)

In this case, Tang and the Company signed a Directorship Agreement in 2006, stipulating that the Company appointed Tang as a director, and he could enjoy rights to receive dividends during the directorship term. However, in the resolution of the Company’s shareholders meeting, Tang was appointed as a supervisor instead of a director. Afterwards, Tang filed a lawsuit with the court to obtain the dividends provided in the agreement.

The court of second instance held that: (1) the shareholders’ meeting had the power for the directors appointment and determination of director remuneration, so the directorship agreement would not enter into force until the shareholders’ meeting had passed relevant resolutions; (2) in terms of the relationship between the shareholders’ meeting resolutions and the directorship agreement (as an engagement contract in nature), appointing directors and determining directors’ remunerations were internal organizational acts of the company and did not involve the protection of the interests of third parties in the transaction.

The court of second instance determined that the Directorship Agreement had not yet come into force as no relevant resolution was made in the shareholders’ meeting. Accordingly, the court ruled not to uphold Tang’s claim.

It is noteworthy that the court of second instance made a legal judgment in this case: “appointing directors and determining directors’ remunerations are internal organizational acts of the company and do not involve the protection of the interests of third parties in the transaction”.

This judgment draws our attention to an issue: whether the directorship agreement is arbitrable.

Ⅱ. An Article in People's Court Daily

The court of first instance of the case published in the People’s Court Daily on 14 Jan. 2021 an article titled Director Appointment Agreements without a Valid Resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting Shall Be Invalid (未经股东会作出有效决议而签订的董事委托合同无效), introducing and analyzing the aforementioned case. The author of the article emphasized that: (1) pursuant to Article 37 of the Company Law, the election and replacement of directors and supervisors who are not employee representatives and determination on the remuneration of directors and supervisors are within the functions and powers of the shareholders’ meeting of a limited liability company; (2) the agreement on the appointment and remuneration of directors signed between the company and the potential directors is a type of engagement contract for the company to entrust the director candidates to perform the duties as a director and deal with the company's affairs.

It can thus be seen that, in the view of the court of second instance, the company’s execution of the agreement on the appointment and remuneration of directors is actually arranged by the Company in accordance with the Company Law and the Articles of Association with respect to its organizational structure and internal governance and other matters, and such matters will not involve any transaction or protection of the interests of the parties to the contract.

Therefore, disputes arising from such director engagement agreements are likely to be regarded by the court as corporate governance disputes, rather than contractual disputes and other disputes over property rights and interests between citizens, legal persons, and other organizations of equal status, which may be submitted for arbitration pursuant to Articles 2 and 3 of the Arbitration Law.

In summary, the author of this post reminds that: based on the opinion of the court of second instance in this case, disputes arising out of director engagement agreements, at least the part relating to the organizational structure and internal governance matters will probably fail to comply with the provisions on arbitrability of the Arbitration Law, and therefore the dispute has to be submitted to the court in accordance with the Company Law and the Articles of Association.

Disclaimer: This post does not represent legal advice by the author on any relevant issues. If you need legal advice or professional analysis, please consult with an attorney.


TESG
企业概况
联系我们
专家顾问
企业文化
党风建设
核心团队
资质荣誉
合规监管
部门职责
转创中国
加入转创
经济合作
智库专家
质量保证
咨询流程
联系我们
咨询
IPO咨询
投融资咨询
会计服务
绩效管理
审计和风险控制
竞争战略
审计与鉴证、估价
企业管理咨询
人力资源战略与规划
融资与并购财务顾问服务
投资银行
企业文化建设
财务交易咨询
资本市场及会计咨询服务
创业与私营企业服务
公司治理、合规与反舞弊
国企改革
价值办公室
集团管控
家族企业管理
服务
数据分析
资信评估
投资咨询
风险及控制服务
管理咨询
转型升级服务
可行性研究咨询服务
民企与私人客户服务
解决方案
内控
税收内部控制
税收风险管理
内控管理师
内部控制咨询
信用研究
信用法制中心
风险与内控咨询
无形资产内控
企业内控审计
内部控制服务
内部控制评价
内部控制体系建设
内部控制智库
上市公司内控
上市公司独立董事
投行
M&A
资本市场
SPAC
科创板
金融信息库
IPO咨询
北交所
ASX
SGX
HKEX
金融服务咨询
信用评级
上海证券交易所
NYSE
深圳证券交易所
审计
审计资料下载
法证会计
审计事务
审计及鉴证服务
审计咨询
反舞弊中心
内部控制审计
内部审计咨询
国际审计
合规
银行合规专题
合规管理建设年
海关与全球贸易合规
数据合规专题
反腐败中心
反垄断合规
反舞弊中心
国际制裁
企业合规中心
信用合规专题
证券合规专题
合规中心
金融合规服务
反洗钱中心
全球金融犯罪评论
行业
新基建
文化、体育和娱乐业
电信、媒体和技术(TMT)
投城交通事业部
房地产建筑工程
医疗卫生和社会服务
可持续发展与环保
全球基础材料
大消费事业部
金融服务业
化学工程与工业
一带一路
智慧生活与消费物联
数字经济发展与检测
食品开发与营养
先进制造事业部
能源资源与电力
消费与工业产品
运输与物流
酒店旅游餐饮
科学研究与技术服务
政府及公共事务
化妆品与个人护理
一二三产融合
生物医药与大健康
新能源汽车与安全产业
法律
法律信息库
税法与涉税服务
数字法治与网络安全
劳动与人力资源法律
金融与资本市场法律
司法研究所
公司法专题
私募股权与投资基金
债务重组与清算/破产
转创国际法律事务所
转创法信事务所
财税
法务会计
管理会计案例
决策的财务支持
家族资产和财富传承
财税法案例库
资产评估
财税信息库
会计准则
财务研究所
财政税收
财政研究所
会计研究所
财税实务
投资咨询
财务管理咨询
审计事务
管理
转创智库
金融研究所
企业管理研究所
中国企业国际化发展
经济与产业研究
气候变化与可持续
ESG中心
管理咨询
转创
咨询业数据库
转创网校
生物医药信息库
建筑工程库
转创首都
转创教育
转创国际广东 官网
科研创服
中国转创杂志社
创新创业
转型升级
技术转移中心
转创中国
中外
粤港澳大湾区
中国-东盟
一带一路
澳大利亚
俄罗斯
新加坡
英国
加拿大
新西兰
香港
美国
中非平台
开曼群岛
法国
欧洲联盟
印度
北美洲
18318889481 13681114876
在线QQ
在线留言
返回首页
返回顶部
留言板
发送